With almost 2300 likes, over 7,000 diggs and a buttload of comments, Brian Murphy’s “4 Awkward Moments in Facebook Likes” has become the most viewed article on CollegeHumor of all time. That’s right, after years of writing articles, coming up with creative ideas and putting pen to paper (or at least fingers to keyboard), the pinnacle of humor is a fake photoshop about liking stuff on Facebook.
Let’s take a look at the top seven most-viewed articles on CollegeHumor of all time, shall we?
#7: “Why You Should Always Log Out” By Jeff Rosenberg
This article features Jeff supposedly finding computers with people’s stuff logged in, then messing with them. This article was mildly funny, but only made funnier by the outraged response from Digg users, who called police, posted threatening comments, and even created a photoshop of a newspaper purported to be Rosie getting arrested.
Running tally: Articles that are “real”: 1, Articles solely based on humor: 0.
#6: “The Facebook of Genesis“ by Andrew B.
One of the best entries into the Facebook news feed trend, this style of joke was overused for a long period on CollegeHumor, only occsaionally providing genuine laughs. Luckily incoporating religion or history into Facebook is usually a pretty good bet for a funny article.
Articles that are “real”: 1, Articles solely based on humor: 1.
#5: “Who’s Bringing the Microwave?” by Jeff Rosenberg.
A supposed “cousin” of Jeff Rosenberg’s is starting his freshman year, only to find his roommate is kind of a douche. Jordan appears to be no whiz kid himself; hijinks and racism ensue. This is clearly fake, yet features the “found online” tag, in an attempt to convince people it’s real. Again it hits the front page of Digg, with people arguing on the validity of the article.
Articles that are “real”: 2, Articles solely based on humor: 1.
#4: “Anatomy of a One-Night Stand” by Sarah Schneider.
This one is a classic. It doesn’t rely on any pre-existing template, and features hilarious illustrations. It’s no wonder CH has put it on their front page approximately 6,000 times.
Articles that are “real”: 2, Articles solely based on humor: 2.
#3: “The Answer is NOT Always C” by Jeff Rosenberg.
Rosie’s friend is so stupid dudes. Did you see this test he took? He filled in C for every answer on a true-false test! LOL! Dismissive wanking aside, this is a pretty funny idea, as long as you take it with a grain of salt, knowing that it is, of course, fake. Some people don’t seem to realize that.
Articles that are “real”: 3, Articles solely based on humor: 2.
#2: “Facebook Mom” by Jeff Rosenberg
One of Rosie’s brother’s friends sent him this hilarious (and totally real!!!!) exchange between a mother and student. Only thing is, that’s not her son! Moms are so stupid!!!!!!!!!!1!. Clearly fake, but pandering to an audience that would prefer it not to be.
Articles that are “real”: 4, Articles solely based on humor: 2.
#1: The aforemetioned Brian Murphy article, which not only had a grammatical error in the original photo (which CH quickly replaced), but also features a guy that was already used in another humor article that went to the front page of Digg a couple months ago. And yet the final total is…
Articles that are “real”: 5, Articles solely based on humor: 2.
Things to take away from all of this:
1. The two most-viewed articles of all time were published in the last 10 days.
2. I actually feel for the writers of these articles a bit. How does it feel to have a legitimately funny dialogue-based article that you spent time crafting get beaten out by something you can create in Photoshop in 15 minutes? I love Brian Murphy’s articles. He’s probably the most consistent writer there right now. But this article will always be at the top of the heap.
3. Time to strike while the iron is hot. I’ve already got some ideas for fake (REAL!) Facebook photoshops that I could use, and I plan on doing it. It just makes sense: If it’s going to get the pageviews, it will get me the money, and therefore help pay my rent.
4. Before any of you think that I’m hating on the entire CH article structure, let’s be clear that I still enjoyed most of these articles for what they were, and even ‘liked’ a few of them. However, it shows that the CH audience is changing, becoming younger, and significantly dumber.
(And before anyone calls me a hypocrite for hating on “real” articles and Facebook-based articles, my two most successful articles were based on Facebook. One was a fake news-feed, and one was a “real” interaction, which netted me tons of hateful messages from users over at eBaum’s world when it got linked there.